Comparison of Short- and Medium-Term Clinical Outcomes between Transradial Approach and Transfemoral Approach in a High-Volume PCI Heart Center in China

نویسندگان

  • Peiyuan He
  • Yuejin Yang
  • Shubin Qiao
  • Bo Xu
  • Min Yao
  • Yongjian Wu
  • Jinqing Yuan
  • Jue Chen
  • Haibo Liu
  • Jun Dai
  • Xiao Yang
  • Xinran Tang
  • Yang Wang
  • Wei Li
  • Runlin Gao
چکیده

BACKGROUND Transradial approach (TRA) outweighed transfemoral approach (TFA) in acute coronary syndrome patients because the former has better short-term outcomes in high-volume percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) centers. Our study was one of the limited studies specifically in comparing the short- and medium-term effects of TRA and those of TFA in patients undergoing elective PCIs. METHODS A total of 21,242 patients who underwent elective PCI with stent implantation were included. Using propensity score methodology, 1,634 patient pairs were matched. Major clinical outcomes and PCI-related complications between TRA and TFA were compared. RESULTS In the propensity score-matched patients, the rates of in-hospital net adverse clinical events, which included death, myocardial infarction (MI), target vessel revascularization (TVR), stroke, and major bleeding, were much lower with TRA than with TFA (1.8% vs. 3.9%, P < 0.001). This difference was mainly due to the lower rate of major bleeding (0.6% vs. 1.8%, P < 0.001) and the decreased rate of MI (1.1% vs. 1.9%, P = 0.060). PCI-related dissection and thrombosis were similar between the TRA and TFA groups (both P > 0.05). Meanwhile, one-year incidence rates of major adverse cardiovascular events, which included death, MI, and TVR, were also similar (4.1% vs. 4.9%, P = 0.272) in TRA and TFA. Multivariable regression analyses showed that TRA was an independent predictor of the low rate of in-hospital net adverse clinical events (odds ratio, 0.53; 95% confidence interval, 0.40 to 0.71), but not of major adverse cardiovascular events at one-year follow-up (hazard ratio, 1.01; 95% confidence interval, 0.96 to 1.06). CONCLUSIONS In patients undergoing elective PCI, TRA patients had lower rates of in-hospital net adverse clinical outcomes compared with TFA patients. TRA might be recommended as a routine approach in high-volume PCI hospitals for elective PCIs.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

RADIal versus femoral approach for percutaneous coronary interventions in patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction (RADIAMI): A prospective, randomized, single-center clinical trial.

BACKGROUND The transradial approach for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) seems to be superior to transfemoral. The safety and efficacy of transradial approach for PCI in acute myocardial infarction is not well-established. METHODS Hundred patients with acute myocardial infarction qualified to PCI were randomly assigned to transradial (group I; n = 50) and transfemoral (group II; n = 5...

متن کامل

Transradial Neurointerventional Approach to Basilar Tip Aneurysm: Case Report and Technical Note

Cerebral angiography through transfemoral approach is preferred in most of the situation though in cardiovascular surgery transradial angiography is accounted as the superior standard. The present study aimed at presenting our early experience of transradial approach to cerebral angiography and intervention of a patient with basilar tip aneurysm that had inappropriate vasculature to perform rou...

متن کامل

Immediate results of percutaneous coronary intervention for unprotected left main coronary artery stenoses: transradial versus transfemoral approach.

BACKGROUND The effectiveness of a transradial approach for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is comparable to that of a transfemoral approach. However, few studies have systematically compared the clinical effectiveness of a transradial approach with that of a transfemoral approach for unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) stenoses. We compared success rate, vascular complication...

متن کامل

Safety and Efficacy of Transradial versus Transfemoral Approach in Primary Coronary Angioplasty for Acute ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Background: Several randomized trials performed showed increase safety and efficacy of Transradial approach in primary PCI when compared with Transfemoral approach. Method: this study included 75 patients presenting to the National Heart Institute for the first time with acute ST segment elevation myocardial infarction divided into two groups ; Group A included 25 patients who were treated by p...

متن کامل

Costs and Benefits Associated With Transradial Versus Transfemoral Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in China.

BACKGROUND Transradial percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been increasingly adopted in clinical practice, given its potential advantages over transfemoral intervention; however, the impact of different access strategies on costs and clinical outcomes remains poorly defined, especially in the developing world. METHODS AND RESULTS Using data from a consecutive cohort of 5306 patients ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره 10  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2015